Economy and Economics
Economy and Economics
Economy: It is the state of a country or region in terms of the production and consumption of goods and services and the supply of money.
Economics: It is the branch of knowledge concerned with the production, consumption and transfer of wealth.
Types of Economy
⇒ Depending upon the dominant view of the time in a particular country, different forms of production patterns evolved and different economic systems finally came up, providing alternative ways of organising an economy.
⇒ The three models of economic systems which we see coming up are basically the different stages in the evolutionary process for our experiments which define a better way of organising our economy.
1. Capitalistic Economy
⇒ The capitalistic form of economy has its origin in the famous work of Adam Smith-Wealth of Nations (1776). Adam Smith (1723-1790) the Scottish philosophereconomist professor at University of Glasgow whose writings formed the basis of classical economics had stressed certain fine ideas which were to take fancy among some of the western countries and finally capitalism took birth.
⇒ Smith raised his voice against the heavy-handed government regulation of commerce and industry of the time which did not allow the economy to tap its full economic worth and reach the level of wellbeing. Stressing ‘division of labour’, an environment of ‘laissez faire’ (non-interference by the government), he proposed that the ‘invisible hand’ of ‘market forces’ (price mechanism) will bring a state of equilibrium in the economy and a general well-being to the countrymen. For such an economy to function for public well-being, he has acknowledged the need of competition in the market.
⇒ Once the USA attained Independence the ideas of Adam Smith were made part of its public policy-just one year after Wealth of Nations was published. From here the idea spread to other parts of Euro-America-by 1800 the economic system called ‘capitalism’ was established which was later known by different names-Private Enterprise System. Free Enterprise System, Market Economy.
⇒ The decisions of what to produce, how much to produce and at what price to sell are taken by the market, by the private enterprises in this system, with the state having no economic role.
As Keynes has suggested that the capitalist economy should move few steps towards socialistic economy, Prof. Lange was suggesting just the same in the case of the state economies.
2. State Economy
⇒ Rooted in the ideas of historical change proposed by the German philosopher Karl Marx (1818-1883) more specifically, this kind of economic system first came up in the erstwhile USSR after the Bolshevik Revolution (1917) and got its ideal shape in the People’s Republic of China (1949).
⇒ This form of economic system also spread to other countries in eastern Europe. Here we see two versions of the state economy-in erstwhile USSR known as the socialist economy and in pre-1985 China as the communist economy.
⇒ While socialistic economy emphasised the collective ownership of the means of production (property and assets) and it also ascribed a large role to the state in running the economy, communist economy advocated state ownership of all properties including labour and absolute power to state in running the economy.
⇒ Though for Marx, Socialism was a transitional stage to communism, it never did happen in reality.
⇒ The socialist and communist economies used to criticise capitalistic economics of being based on exploitation. In response, the capitalist economies called them the practioners of ‘state capitalism’, where the states were the sole exploitators.
3. Mixed Economy
⇒ The belief in the self-correcting quality of the market and the ‘invisible hand’ of Adam Smith got a major setback in early 20th century during the ‘Great Depression (1929).
⇒ The impact of the depression spread from the USA to other economies of Western Europe escalating large scale unemployment, downfall in demand and economic activities and lockouts in industrial enterprises. The prevailing Smithonian macro ideas failed to check the crisis. A new approach was needed which came in the famous work.
⇒ The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (1936) by the English economist at Cambridge University, John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946).
⇒ Keynes questioned the very principle of ‘laissez-faire’ and the nature of the ‘invisible hand’. He even opined that the invisible hand brings equilibrium to the economy but by ‘strangulating the poor’. He suggested that prices and wages are not flexible enough to provide empolyment to all.
⇒ Questioning the limitations of the market mechanism, Keynes suggested strong government intervention in the economy. To get the economy out of the depression, he suggested an increase in government expenditures, discretionary fiscal policy (fiscal deficit, lower interest rates, cheap money supply, etc.) to boost the demand of goods and services as this was the reason behind the depression.
⇒ As Keynesian policies were followed, the concerned economies were successfully pulled out of the Great Depression.
⇒ As a follow up to the Keynesian advices, many were initiated trendsetting economic policies throughout the capitalist economies. One very important initiative which came out was the government’s active role in the economy.
⇒ The essential goods and services which were till date being purchased by the people as ‘private goods’ were soon made available by the state ‘free-of-cost’ giving people more spare money to create demand for the goods and services which were part of the market.
⇒ The mixed economy arrived in this way and the classical capitalistic economy was challenged by it.
⇒ On the margins of the developments given above, it is interesting to note the developments in the state economies of the time. It was Prof. Oscar Lange (1904-65), the Polish philosopher, who in 1950s suggested the same thing for the socialist economy as Keynes had for the capitalist. Prof. Lange praised the state economy for many of its good things, but also suggested inclusion of some of the good things of the capitalistic economy.
⇒ He advised the state economies to adopt ‘market socialism (the term was coined by him). His suggestions were outrightly rejected by the state economies as such compromises in the socialistic economic order were blasphemous at that time (this was ultimately a suggestion towards democracy from dictatorship).
⇒ As Keynes has suggested that the capitalist economy should move few steps towards socialistic economy, Prof. Lange was suggesting just the same in the case of the state economies. Democracies are flexible thus they were able to go for an experiment which paid them in coming times.
Economic Growth and Development
⇒ A term coming from the life sciences, ‘growth’ in economics means economic growth. An increase in economic variables over a period of time is-economic growth. The most important aspect of growth is its quantifiability, i.e. one can measure it in absolute terms*.
(*As the IMF and the WB considered this yardstick of development as quoted in Gerald M. Meier and James E. Rauch, Leading issues in Economic Development, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 2006.)
⇒ All the units of measurement may be applied to show it, depending upon the economic variable, where the growth is being studied. We have a few examples:
1. An economy might have been able to see growth in food production during a decade which could be measured in tonnes.
2. The growth of road network in an economy might be measured for a decade or any period in miles or kilometres.
3. Similarly, the value of the total production of an economy might be measured in currency terms which means the economy is growing.
4. Per capita income for an economy might be measured in monetary terms over a period.
We may say that economic growth is a quantitative progress.
To calculate the growth rate of an economic variable the difference between the concerned period is converted into percentage form.
⇒ Growth rate is an annual concept which may be used. Otherwise with the clear reference to the period for which it is used.
⇒ Though growth is a value neutral term, i.e., it might be positive or negative for an economy for a period, we generally use it in the positive sense. If economists say an economy is growing it means the economy is having a positive growth otherwise they use the term ‘negative growth’.
Economic Development
⇒ Economic growth was considered as a cause and effect for the betterment of lives of the people. This was the reason why economists till the 1950s failed to distinguish between growth and development though they knew the difference between these terms.
⇒ It was during the 1960s and in the later decades that economists came across many countries where the growth was comparatively higher, but the quality of life was comparatively low.
⇒ For economists, development indicates the quality of life in the economy which might be seen in accordance with the availability of so many variables such as:
1. The level of nutrition
2. The expansion and the reach of healthcare facilitieshospitals, medicines, safe drinking water, vaccination, sanitation, etc.
3. The level of education among the people
4. Other variables on which the quality of life depends
⇒ Here, one basic thing must be kept in mind that if the masses are to be guaranteed with a basic minimum level of quality-enhancing inputs (above-given variables such as food, health, education, etc.) in their life, a minimum level of income has to be guaranteed for them. Income is generated from productive activities. It means that before assuring development we need to assure growth.
⇒ Higher economic development requires higher economic growth. But it does not mean that a higher economic growth automatically brings in higher economic development-a development-a confusion the early economists failed to clear.
Follow on Facebook page – Click Here
Google News join in – Click Here
Read More Asia News – Click Here
Read More Sports News – Click Here
Read More Crypto News – Click Here